NOAA-led study: Colorado oil and gas wells emit more pollutants than expected

Feb. 27, 2012

Contact: Katy Human, 301-497-4747

When NOAA scientists began routinely monitoring the atmosphere’s composition at a tower north of Denver a few years ago, their instruments immediately sniffed something strange: plumes of air rich with chemical pollutants including the potent greenhouse gas methane.

Some of the pollutants picked up are known to damage air quality. Another, methane, is 25 times more effective per molecule than carbon dioxide at trapping heat in the atmosphere. The scientists were concerned. None of NOAA’s other air composition monitoring towers – there are eight, in total, scattered around the continental United States – had recorded anything similar.

“So we set out to figure out where these chemicals were coming from, by going from the tower measurements 1,000 feet high up, down to the ground in a mobile laboratory,” said Gabrielle Petron, Ph.D., an atmospheric scientist with NOAA’s Earth System Research Laboratory (ESRL) and the Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences (CIRES).

Petron and co-workers customized air sampling devices and atmospheric chemistry instruments and headed out to northeastern Colorado, downwind of possible sources to collect chemical “fingerprints” that would help identify the possible sources.

After taking dozens of samples and thousands of readings along rural roads, near oil and gas equipment, landfills, and animal feeding operations, the research team has an answer: The unusual air pollutants seen at the Denver tower came primarily from oil and gas production in northeastern Colorado’s Weld County.

“We found gas operations in the region leaked about twice as much methane into the atmosphere as previously estimated,” Petron said. “And the oil and gas infrastructure was leaking other air pollutants, too, including benzene, which is regulated because of its toxicity.”

Petron is lead author in a paper published online in the Journal of Geophysical Research this week.

In 2008, the year most of the data were collected, Weld County had nearly 14,000 operating oil and gas wells.

The research team’s chemical fingerprinting work showed that oil and gas equipment and activities – well pads equipment including condensate storage tanks, pipelines, compressors and more – leaked or vented an estimated 4 percent of all natural gas produced to the atmosphere. That loss is about double the previous best-guess estimate, based on engineering calculations and industry data, of about 2 percent loss.

“We may have been significantly underestimating methane emissions by this industry in this region,” Petron said.

The team also found that emissions of benzene, a known carcinogen, are underestimated. Benzene is tracked and regulated by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

Petron and her colleagues found evidence of at least two sources of benzene in the region: oil and gas operations and something else, most likely cars and trucks on roads. And the new study found benzene emissions from oil and gas operations in the region to be significantly higher than expected, between 385 and 2,055 metric tons in 2008, compared with earlier estimates ranging from about 60 to 145 per year.

Finally, the researchers’ findings suggest that oil and gas-related emissions of more reactive volatile organic compounds, which contribute to lung-damaging ozone pollution, are also underestimated. More reactive VOCs were not directly measured in the 2008 study, but are almost certainly co-emitted with methane and larger alkanes. According to the EPA, the northern Front Range has been out of compliance with federal health-based standards in the summer since 2007.

Chemist Greg Frost, Ph.D. also with NOAA and CIRES and a co-author of the new study, said the work demonstrates the value of studying emissions from several perspectives. Top-down studies (such as from the tall tower) can complement and verify bottom-up approaches (such as estimates based on average leak rates at pipe junctions). 

“What Gabrielle has done is to use the mobile laboratory and tower data to make top-down estimates of emissions, which can be used to evaluate the bottom-up estimates from industry and regulatory agencies,” Frost said. “This is going to inspire a lot more research.”

NOAA’s mission is to understand and predict changes in the Earth’s environment, from the depths of the ocean to the surface of the sun, and to conserve and manage our coastal and marine resources. Join us on Facebook, Twitter and our other social media channels


Link to Article:

One response to “NOAA-led study: Colorado oil and gas wells emit more pollutants than expected

  1. Suzy, there is a continuing unresolved debate over the benefits versus costs of the whole process of mining shale gas. The industry is expanding its lease holdings in other parts of Ohio and may initiate operations in Athens within the near future, especially if wet gas or oil is found in our part of the Utica shale formation. In the end, interests (benefits) may well prevail over independent and vigorous research (evidence of costs). In the meantime, the findings reflected in the article on air emissions from gas drilling adds to the case for a ban, moratorium, or, at least, of first ensuring that sensible regulation is in place.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s